Menu
Hooks and Harmony
Melodic pop and 80s music – especially for you.
  • Essays
    • Desert Island Discs
    • Whatever Happened To…?
  • Reviews
    • The Greatest Albums of the 1980s
    • A Second Listen
  • Lists
  • Interviews
  • About
Hooks and Harmony

R.E.M. vs. U2, Part 1

Posted on April 25, 2008October 6, 2018 by Peter Lee

Alt-Rock Smackdown: R.E.M. vs. U2
  • R.E.M. vs. U2, Part 1
  • R.E.M. vs. U2, Part 2
  • R.E.M. vs. U2, Part 3

Bono & Michael Stipe

Who’s better: R.E.M. or U2?

It may not seem like it now, but for most of the 80s and part of the 90s both groups seemed to stare eyeball to eyeball, releasing one album after another. And their careers have been remarkably similar. Both bands:

  • Started in the early 80s, gained popularity during the decade and rose to prominence by the late 1980s.
  • Carried the banner of college and alternative rock and at one time were called the best rock band in the US/UK/World.
  • Had guitarists with a distinct sound.
  • Punctuated their songs with political messages (albeit in different ways).
  • Experimented with new sounds, with varying degrees of success.

With R.E.M. releasing its 14th album, Accelerate, and U2 planning their 12th album, I wanted to look at how their careers compare. I can’t guarantee that I’ll come up with a winner at the end; that would be like choosing which of your children is your favorite.

The numbers

Here’s a table of every year since 1980 that either R.E.M. or U2 has released an album:

Year R.E.M. U2
1980   Boy
1981   October
1982
1983 Murmur War
1984 Reckoning The Unforgettable Fire
1985 Fables of the Reconstruction  
1986 Lifes Rich Pageant  
1987 Document The Joshua Tree
1988 Green Rattle and Hum
1989
1990
1991 Out of Time Achtung Baby
1992 Automatic for the People  
1993   Zooropa
1994 Monster  
1995
1996 New Adventures in Hi-Fi  
1997   Pop
1998 Up  
1999
2000   All That You Can’t
Leave Behind
2001 Reveal  
2002
2003
2004 Around the Sun How to Dismantle
an Atomic Bomb
2005
2006
2007
2008 Accelerate


U2’s career spans more years (28 to 25), but R.E.M. has released three more albums (14 vs. 11). In fact, R.E.M. has been remarkably consistent until recently, releasing albums annually from 1983 through 1988 and churning out five from 1991 to 1998. What’s remarkable is that during that first spurt of creativity, they put out their best work: Murmur, named Best Album in 1983 by Rolling Stone; 1985’s Fables of the Reconstruction, a dark, epic album that captured Southern tales and culture; and Lifes Rich Pageant, arguably their first (and best) rock album. They have been less productive during the 2000s, releasing only three albums since 1998 – and two of those are considered among their worst material.

U2 has been more deliberate, starting quickly (with four albums in five years). But it has spent four years between albums three different times, the latest being right now, as we’re waiting for the follow-up to 2004’s How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb.

But let’s take a look at the middle of the table, from 1987 to 1991. During these years, both bands were at their commercial and creative peak. U2 released what some consider one of the greatest albums in the rock era – The Joshua Tree – and after a mediocre soundtrack to their documentary, they waited three years before rebounding with their pivotal Achtung Baby. Meanwhile, R.E.M. finally got a top 10 song with “The One I Love” from 1987’s Document. They switched labels to Warner Brothers, got another Top 10 song with “Stand,” and then captured seven Grammy nominations (winning three) from their 1991 album Out of Time.

Commercial success

Here’s another table:

Top 10 Mainstream Rock songs (Number 1 songs)

R.E.M. U2
Average album chart position, US 12th 18th
Average album chart position, UK 18th 7th
Top 10 albums, US (Number 1 albums) 7 (2) 7 (6)
Top 10 albums, UK (Number 1 albums) 8 (7) 9 (8)
Number of albums sold, total 19.5 million 43 million
Top 10 songs, US (Number 1 songs) 4 (0) 6 (2)
Top 10 songs, UK (Number 1 songs) 11 (0) 33 (5)
Top 10 Modern Rock songs (Number 1 songs) 14 (6) 18 (8)

Source: Wikipedia

Wow. Looking at it from a pure sales standpoint, there’s no contest: U2 wins hands down. They’ve sold more than twice as many albums and had more top 10 and number 1 songs. R.E.M. has never hit number 1 on either the US or UK charts, but surprisingly, they have fared better in Britain than in the US, with more top 10 albums, almost four times as many number 1 albums, and almost three times as many top 10 songs. Of course, U2 has amassed an amazing 33 top 10 songs in the UK. The only solace R.E.M. can take from these numbers is that they compare pretty closely on the mainstream and modern rock charts. But we already knew that they’re both darlings of college and alternative rock.

U2’s success has been energized by The Joshua Tree and Achtung Baby, which account for 18 of the 43 million albums sold. Those two albums vaulted the band into Greatest Band in the World status, and despite a drop in popularity during the late 90s, they have bounced back in the 21st century with two solid albums, “reapplying for the job of best band in the world,” said Bono. They are arena rock superstars, and every one of their albums has gone at least platinum (1 million units sold).

R.E.M. can point to the early 1990s as the pinnacle of their commercial success. Out of Time, Automatic for the People and Monster each sold 4 million copies. But as they say on Wall Street, past performance is no indicator of future success. Once R.E.M. lost its drummer, Bill Berry, the group moved toward a more production-oriented sound, settling for conservative, middle-of-the-road folk-pop. As a result, Up and Reveal only went gold, and 2004’s Around the Sun barely sold 200,000 copies. That would get some bands dropped from their label. In fact, Blender magazine recently named Warner Brothers’ $80 million record contract with R.E.M. in 1996 as the 13th biggest record company screw-up of all time.

One final note: Some of both bands’ most popular songs did not transfer to chart success. Take, for instance, R.E.M.:

  • Radio Free Europe (#75)
  • Fall On Me (#94)
  • It’s the End of the World As We Know It (And I Feel Fine) (#69)
  • Everybody Hurts (#29)
  • Man on the Moon (#30)

Here are some of U2’s famous releases:

  • Sunday Bloody Sunday (did not chart)
  • New Year’s Day (#53)
  • Pride (In the Name of Love) (#33)
  • One (#10) – Successful, yes, but when compared to its legacy, not so much. Rolling Stone places it at #36 among the all-time greatest songs, and a similar Q magazine poll has the song topping the chart.
  • Beautiful Day (#21)

NOTE: These are U.S. chart positions only; most of these songs performed better in the UK, especially U2’s songs. We have a lot of work to do here in the USA. Hence, my blog.

Part 2 (coming soon): But what about the music?

Series NavigationR.E.M. vs. U2, Part 2 >>

Share this:

Related Posts:

  • Book Review: Cool Town, Grace Elizabeth Hale
    Book Review: Cool Town, Grace Elizabeth Hale
  • R.E.M. vs. U2, Part 2
    R.E.M. vs. U2, Part 2
  • Teenage Fanclub: The Next Beatles?
    Teenage Fanclub: The Next Beatles?
  • The 5 Most Influential Artists of the 1970s
    The 5 Most Influential Artists of the 1970s

6 thoughts on “R.E.M. vs. U2, Part 1”

  1. U2 Concert says:
    February 24, 2009 at 10:56 pm

    Regardless of all the charts and other information, I personally am a huge fan of U2. Simply love them. There music is really awesome. Thanks for the comparisons by the way. Been a big fan of U2 and always will be 🙂

  2. dave says:
    August 19, 2010 at 8:53 pm

    Man you are wrong. R.E.M. have sold above 70 millions CDs worldwide ! Just look at wikipedia webside and read about them.I see that you cant look at this objectively.

  3. martin says:
    September 9, 2010 at 4:53 pm

    Everyone will have their own view. Both bands should have quit years ago as they are both irrelevant now and churn out consistent mediocrity. To answer your question though when I first heard U2 I thought wow, here is a great band. When I first heard REM I didnt know what to think. I couldnt think. I was mesmerised. Couldnt explain it. Still cant. Have still to this day never been touched by music like that and never will again. Fell head over heels. Immediately proposed. Married and divorced. They’re just an old friend now but when I listen to the old tapes I’m in love all over again.

  4. electroglodyte says:
    April 14, 2011 at 11:42 am

    “R.E.M. have sold above 70 millions CDs worldwide ! Just look at wikipedia webside and read about them.I see that you cant look at this objectively.”

    Looking at it objectively, I cruised over to the U2 entry on Wikipedia: 150 million CDs sold worldwide. So the comparison holds.

    Don’t get me wrong: I’m firmly in the R.E.M. camp. I like U2 as well (especially Achtung Baby, Zooropa and Pop), but R.E.M. has been the soundtrack to my life for almost 30 years now. The number of albums sold don’t interest me that much. That was actually part of R.E.M.’s early appeal – it was the “party in the basement” that nobody knew about, the college rock years. The IRS albums will always mean more to me than the more commercially successful ones that followed.

    It’s a matter of taste and priorities. I can appreciate that the Beatles are “better” than the Rolling Stones and may have had more of an impact on music history, but I still prefer to listen to early Rolling Stones over the Beatles any day.

  5. electroglodyte says:
    April 14, 2011 at 11:50 am

    “In fact, Blender magazine recently named Warner Brothers’ $80 million record contract with R.E.M. in 1996 as the 13th biggest record company screw-up of all time.”

    Ha. I said that at the time. Fair play to the band to get the deal, but it didn’t make sense to me because R.E.M. simply didn’t do hit singles, not to the extent where a deal like that would make sense. They’re an iconic band, and so perhaps it made sense to Warner Bros. to have them on board, but I never saw that deal as adding up.

  6. Adrian says:
    June 6, 2011 at 9:08 pm

    R.E.M., hands down.

Comments are closed.

Social

Visit Us On FacebookVisit Us On TwitterCheck Our FeedVisit Us On Instagram

Popular Posts

  • Whatever Happened to the Sundays?
  • Whatever Happened to Rick Astley?
  • Whatever Happened to Tiffany?
  • 25 Reasons the Beatles are the Greatest Band Ever
  • Lives in the Balance – Jackson Browne (1986)
  • Whatever happened to Taco?
  • Whatever happened to Kajagoogoo?

Blogroll

  • Any Major Dude With Half a Heart
  • Bloggerhythms
  • I Don't Hear A Single
  • Paste Magazine
  • Popdose
  • Power Popaholic
  • PowerPop
  • PowerPop Square
  • Powerpopulist
  • The Hideaway
  • The Hits Just Keep On Comin'
  • Too Poppy

About Me

  • Brad Delp Discography Site
  • Peter Lee
  • Spectacular Bid Book

Contact Us

Privacy Policy

Hooks and Harmony is a blog dedicated to melodic pop music and 80s music.

©2021 Hooks and Harmony
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

SAVE & ACCEPT